Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Analiza bayesiană a tabelelor de contingență× | Analiza prin tabele de contingență× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Statistică | Statistică |
| Familie | Hypothesis test | Hypothesis test |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1974 | 1900 |
| Autorul original≠ | Gunel & Dickey | Karl Pearson |
| Tip≠ | Bayesian association test | Descriptive and inferential categorical analysis |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Gunel, E., & Dickey, J. (1974). Bayes factors for independence in contingency tables. Biometrika, 61(3), 545–557. DOI ↗ | Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine, 50(302), 157–175. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | Bayesian chi-square test, Bayesian contingency table test, Bayes factor association test, Bayesian crosstab analysis | crosstab, contingency table analysis, two-way frequency table, bivariate frequency analysis |
| Înrudite≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Rezumat≠ | Bayesian cross-tabulation analysis tests whether two categorical variables are associated by computing a Bayes factor that quantifies the evidence for an association model against an independence model. Unlike classical chi-square testing, it provides a continuous measure of evidence, supports the null hypothesis directly, and updates naturally with prior knowledge about the cell probabilities. | Cross-tabulation analysis (contingency table analysis) is a foundational descriptive and inferential technique for examining the relationship between two or more categorical variables. It arranges observed frequencies into a table of rows and columns, enabling visual inspection of patterns and formal chi-square testing of independence between the variables. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|