Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Acuratețe× | Acuratețe Echilibrată× | Matrice de confuzie× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Evaluarea modelelor | Evaluarea modelelor | Evaluarea modelelor |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Anul apariției≠ | 20th century | 2010 | 20th century |
| Autorul original≠ | Historical statistical foundations | Brodersen, Ong, Stephan, and Buhmann | Statistical foundations |
| Tip≠ | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric | Evaluation visualization |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ | Brodersen, K. H., Ong, C. S., Stephan, K. E., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 3121-3124. DOI ↗ | Everitt, B. S., & Hothorn, T. (2005). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. link ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | Overall Accuracy, Correct Classification Rate | Average Recall, Equal-weight Average Sensitivity | Error Matrix, Contingency Table |
| Înrudite | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Rezumat≠ | Accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions among the total number of predictions made by a classification model. It is the most intuitive performance metric and measures how often the classifier makes correct predictions overall, regardless of class. | Balanced accuracy is the average of recall values computed for each class separately. It corrects for class imbalance by giving equal weight to the performance on each class, regardless of class frequency in the dataset. | The confusion matrix is a table that displays the counts of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. It provides a complete picture of where a classifier makes correct and incorrect predictions, enabling calculation of all other classification metrics. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|
|