Compară metode
Examinează metodele selectate una lângă alta; rândurile care diferă sunt evidențiate.
| Scala de auto-eficacitate academică× | Scala de Angajament al Elevilor× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domeniu | Psihologia educației | Psihologia educației |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anul apariției≠ | 1977 | 2004 |
| Autorul original≠ | Albert Bandura | Jennifer Fredricks, Phyllis Blumenfeld, Alison Paris |
| Tip≠ | Self-efficacy belief measurement | Multidimensional engagement assessment |
| Sursa seminală≠ | Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. DOI ↗ | Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. DOI ↗ |
| Denumiri alternative | ASES, Self-Efficacy for Academic Performance | SES, Academic Engagement Measure |
| Înrudite | 4 | 4 |
| Rezumat≠ | The Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) measures students' beliefs about their capability to succeed in academic tasks. Grounded in Bandura's social cognitive theory, the instrument assesses perceived competence in diverse academic domains—understanding lectures, completing assignments, performing on exams, and engaging in scholarly work. High academic self-efficacy is a strong predictor of achievement, persistence, and resilience in the face of academic challenges. | The Student Engagement Scale (SES) measures the extent to which students are actively involved in academic and social aspects of school or university life. Grounded in Fredricks et al.'s multidimensional framework, the instrument assesses behavioral engagement (participation, attendance, effort), emotional engagement (interest, belonging, enthusiasm), and cognitive engagement (mental effort, deep thinking, persistence). High engagement is consistently associated with better learning outcomes and well-being. |
| ScholarGateSet de date ↗ |
|
|