ScholarGate
Assistente
Process / pipelineDigital controversy cartography

Web Controversy Analysis

Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.

Abrir no MethodMindEm breveAplicar, comparar, obter orientação
Ferramentas e recursos
Baixar slides
Aprender e explorar
VídeoEm breve

Leia o método completo

Exclusivo para membros

Entre com uma conta gratuita para ler esta seção.

Entrar

Mapa de métodos

A vizinhança de métodos relacionados — selecione um nó para explorar.

Fontes

  1. Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558
  2. Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 655-686. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915574602

Como citar esta página

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Web-Based Controversy Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pt/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis

Qual método?

Coloque este método ao lado dos seus pares mais próximos e leia-os lado a lado — a biblioteca dispõe os livros sobre a mesa; a escolha é sua.

Comparar lado a lado

Referenciado por

ScholarGateWeb Controversy Analysis (Web-Based Controversy Analysis). Recuperado em 2026-06-24 de https://scholargate.app/pt/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis · Conjunto de dados: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026