ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Ponderação Espacial por Escore de Propensão×Pareamento Espacial por Escore de Propensão×
ÁreaInferência causalInferência causal
FamíliaRegression modelRegression model
Ano de origem2000s–2010s2000s
Autor originalExtended from Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003) IPTW with spatial adaptations by Keele, Titiunik and others in geographically structured causal designsExtension of Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) PSM to spatial settings; spatial adaptation developed in applied econometrics and epidemiology literature from the 2000s onward
TipoQuasi-experimental / causal inferenceQuasi-experimental matching estimator
Fonte seminalKeele, L., & Titiunik, R. (2015). Geographic Boundaries as Regression Discontinuities. Political Analysis, 23(1), 127-155. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Outros nomesspatial PSW, geographically weighted propensity score weighting, spatial IPTW, spatially adjusted inverse probability weightingSpatial PSM, Geospatial PSM, Spatially-adjusted propensity score matching, Geographic propensity score matching
Relacionados66
ResumoSpatial propensity score weighting extends inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to settings where units are geographically located and treatment assignment may depend on spatial factors such as location, neighborhood characteristics, or spatial clustering. By incorporating spatial covariates into the propensity score model and adjusting standard errors for spatial autocorrelation, it produces more credible causal estimates from observational geographic data.Spatial Propensity Score Matching (Spatial PSM) extends the classic propensity score matching framework to settings where units are embedded in geographic space and treatment assignment or outcomes may be spatially correlated. By incorporating spatial covariates and adjacency structure into the propensity model and matching procedure, it produces causal estimates that account for geographic confounding and spillover effects.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Spatial Propensity Score Weighting · Spatial Propensity Score Matching. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare