ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Ponderação Espacial por Escore de Propensão×Ponderação por Escore de Propensão (PEP / IPW)×
ÁreaInferência causalInferência causal
FamíliaRegression modelRegression model
Ano de origem2000s–2010s1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Autor originalExtended from Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003) IPTW with spatial adaptations by Keele, Titiunik and others in geographically structured causal designsRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TipoQuasi-experimental / causal inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
Fonte seminalKeele, L., & Titiunik, R. (2015). Geographic Boundaries as Regression Discontinuities. Political Analysis, 23(1), 127-155. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Outros nomesspatial PSW, geographically weighted propensity score weighting, spatial IPTW, spatially adjusted inverse probability weightingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Relacionados66
ResumoSpatial propensity score weighting extends inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to settings where units are geographically located and treatment assignment may depend on spatial factors such as location, neighborhood characteristics, or spatial clustering. By incorporating spatial covariates into the propensity score model and adjusting standard errors for spatial autocorrelation, it produces more credible causal estimates from observational geographic data.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Spatial Propensity Score Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare