Comparar métodos

	SAPROF: Avaliação Estruturada de Fatores de Proteção para Risco de Violência	Framework SPJ: Julgamento Profissional Estruturado para Avaliação de Risco
Área	Psicologia forense	Psicologia forense
Família	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Ano de origem	2012	2003
Autor original	Vivienne de Vogel, Corine de Ruiter, Yvonne Bouman, Merike de Vries Robbé	Stephen D. Hart, Peter R. Kropp, David R. Laws
Tipo	Clinician-rated	Clinician-Synthesized
Fonte seminal	de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF: Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (Version 3). Forum Educatief.	Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Laws, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Sexual deviance: Theory, assessment, and treatment. Guilford Press.
Outros nomes	SAPROF, de Vogel SAPROF	SPJ, Structured Professional Judgment, SPJ Framework
Relacionados	4	4
Resumo	The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk (SAPROF) is a 17-item structured professional judgment tool developed by de Vogel, de Ruiter, Bouman, and colleagues (2012) to identify protective factors and strengths in individuals undergoing violence risk assessment. It complements risk assessment instruments (e.g., HCR-20v3) by systematically evaluating resilience, social support, motivation, and positive functioning—domains that mitigate violence risk and inform rehabilitation potential.	The Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ) framework represents a contemporary approach to forensic risk assessment that synthesizes clinical judgment with empirical evidence of risk factors. Rather than producing a numerical score, SPJ guides clinicians through systematic evaluation of case-specific evidence to arrive at a structured, transparent categorical risk judgment. SPJ has become the preferred methodology in many forensic settings globally and underlies instruments such as the HCR-20v3 (violence risk) and sexual offender assessment protocols.