Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Quality Function Deployment× | Six Sigma DMAIC× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área≠ | Delineamento experimental | Gestão da qualidade |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1966 (Japan); popularised in the West ~1988 | 2014 |
| Autor original≠ | Yoji Akao | Motorola; Pyzdek & Keller |
| Tipo≠ | Structured quality planning and product design method | Structured process improvement methodology |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Akao, Y. (Ed.). (1990). Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design. Productivity Press. ISBN: 978-0915299416 | Pyzdek, T., & Keller, P. (2014). The Six Sigma Handbook (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0-07-184053-9 |
| Outros nomes | QFD, House of Quality, customer-driven engineering, voice of the customer matrix | DMAIC Framework, Six Sigma Process Improvement Cycle, Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control, Altı Sigma DMAIC |
| Relacionados≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Resumo≠ | Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a structured method for translating customer needs — the voice of the customer — into specific technical requirements at every stage of product or service development. Originating in Japan in the 1960s, QFD uses a matrix-based tool called the House of Quality to make customer priorities visible, link them to engineering parameters, expose trade-offs, and maintain focus on what customers actually value throughout the design process. | Six Sigma DMAIC is a data-driven, five-phase process improvement methodology — Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control — used to reduce defects and process variation to fewer than 3.4 defects per million opportunities. Originating at Motorola in the 1980s and systematized by practitioners including Pyzdek and Keller, it is widely adopted in manufacturing, healthcare, finance, and service industries seeking sustained quality gains. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|