Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Inércia× | Método do Cotovelo× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Avaliação de modelos | Avaliação de modelos |
| Família | MCDM | MCDM |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1967 | 1953 |
| Autor original≠ | Stuart Lloyd, James MacQueen | Robert Thorndike |
| Tipo≠ | Clustering quality metric | Heuristic optimization criterion |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Lloyd, S. P. (1982). Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28(2), 129-137. DOI ↗ | Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer Series in Statistics. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes≠ | WCSS, within-cluster sum of squares, cluster cohesion | elbow analysis, knee detection |
| Relacionados | 5 | 5 |
| Resumo≠ | Inertia, also called Within-Cluster Sum of Squares (WCSS), is a measure of cluster cohesion that quantifies how tightly points are grouped around their cluster centroids. Lower values indicate more compact, cohesive clusters. Inertia is the primary objective function for k-means clustering and has been a fundamental metric since the method's introduction. | The Elbow Method is a heuristic for selecting the optimal number of clusters in partitional clustering. Introduced by Robert Thorndike in 1953, it involves fitting clustering models for increasing numbers of clusters and plotting the within-cluster sum of squares (WCSS) against the number of clusters. The 'elbow' occurs where the rate of WCSS decrease sharply changes, suggesting an optimal cluster count. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|