ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Inverse Probability Weighting×Ponderação por Escore de Propensão (PEP / IPW)×
ÁreaInferência causalInferência causal
FamíliaRegression modelRegression model
Ano de origem2003–20151983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Autor originalHirano, Imbens & Ridder; further developed by Abrevaya, Hsu & LieliRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TipoCausal inference / weighted regressionCausal inference / reweighting
Fonte seminalHirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Outros nomesHTE-IPW, CATE-IPW, heterogeneous IPW, conditional effect IPWPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Relacionados56
ResumoHTE-IPW extends standard inverse probability weighting to recover how causal effects vary across subgroups or covariate values. By reweighting each observation by the inverse of its estimated treatment probability, the method creates a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of background characteristics, and then estimates conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) as a function of those characteristics.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Inverse Probability Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. Recuperado em 2026-06-20 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare