Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Teste de Capacidade Preditiva Condicional de Giacomini-White× | Regressão Passo a Passo× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área≠ | Econometria | Estatística |
| Família≠ | Hypothesis test | Regression model |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2006 | 1960 |
| Autor original≠ | Raffaella Giacomini & Halbert White | M. A. Efroymson |
| Tipo≠ | Non-nested forecast comparison test | Automated variable selection |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Giacomini, R., & White, H. (2006). Tests of conditional predictive ability. Econometrica, 74(6), 1545–1578. DOI ↗ | Efroymson, M. A. (1960). Multiple regression analysis. In A. Ralston & H. S. Wilf (Eds.), Mathematical Methods for Digital Computers (pp. 191–203). Wiley. link ↗ |
| Outros nomes≠ | GW Test, Conditional Predictive Ability Test, Giacomini-White CPA Test, Koşullu Tahmin Yeteneği Testi | stepwise selection, forward stepwise regression, backward stepwise regression, forward-backward selection |
| Relacionados≠ | 3 | 5 |
| Resumo≠ | The Giacomini-White (GW) test, introduced by Raffaella Giacomini and Halbert White in 2006, evaluates whether two competing forecasting methods have equal conditional predictive ability given information available at the time of forecast. Unlike unconditional tests such as the Diebold-Mariano test, it asks whether one method systematically outperforms the other in specific economic or market conditions, making it especially useful for practitioners who need state-dependent forecast comparisons. | Stepwise regression is an automated variable selection procedure for multiple linear regression that adds or removes predictor variables one at a time according to a statistical criterion, typically the F-statistic or a p-value threshold. The forward-selection algorithm was formally described by Efroymson (1960) and the bidirectional variant was popularised by Draper and Smith in their landmark 1966 text Applied Regression Analysis. Despite widespread historical use, the method is now widely critiqued, making its documentation essential in any canonical methods library. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|