Comparar métodos

	Regressão Gama (GLM)	Regressão Binomial Negativa	Regressão de Poisson e Binomial Negativa
Área	Estatística	Econometria	Econometria
Família	Regression model	Regression model	Regression model
Ano de origem	1989	2011	1998
Autor original	McCullagh & Nelder (GLM framework)	Hilbe (textbook treatment); generalized linear model framework	Cameron & Trivedi (textbook treatment); Hilbe (negative binomial)
Tipo	Generalized linear model	Generalized linear model for count data	Generalized linear model for count data
Fonte seminal	McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall.	Hilbe, J. M. (2011). Negative Binomial Regression (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.	Cameron, A. C. & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press.
Outros nomes	gamma GLM, gamma generalized linear model, Gamma Regresyonu (GLM)	NB regression, NB2 regression, negatif binom regresyonu	count regression, log-linear count model, negative binomial regression, Poisson / Negatif Binom Regresyon
Relacionados	4	4	4
Resumo	Gamma regression is a generalized linear model that uses the gamma distribution to model a positive, right-skewed continuous outcome. Developed within the GLM framework of McCullagh and Nelder (1989), it is an alternative to ordinary linear regression for variables such as health-care costs, durations, and income.	Negative Binomial Regression is a generalized linear model for count outcomes that extends Poisson regression to handle overdispersion, where the variance of the counts exceeds their mean. Developed in the GLM tradition and treated in depth by Hilbe (2011), it adds a dispersion parameter so that inference stays valid when Poisson would understate the spread of the data.	Poisson regression is a generalized linear model for count outcomes — events tallied as non-negative integers such as hospital admissions, accidents, or article counts. It models the log of the expected count as a linear function of the predictors, and is developed in the standard count-data treatment of Cameron and Trivedi (1998); when the counts are over-dispersed, the closely related negative binomial model (Hilbe, 2011) is preferred.