ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Design Misto com Prioridade Quantitativa Orientado à Avaliação×Desenho Pragmático de Métodos Mistos×
ÁreaDelineamento de pesquisaDelineamento de pesquisa
FamíliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem2003–2011Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century
Autor originalTeddlie & Tashakkori; Creswell & Plano ClarkJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty
TipoMixed methods research designMixed methods research design
Fonte seminalTeddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761930129Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Outros nomesQUAN-priority evaluation mixed methods, quantitative-dominant evaluation design, evaluation mixed methods with quantitative priority, QUAN-priority eval MMRpragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods
Relacionados66
ResumoAn evaluation-oriented quantitative-priority mixed methods design applies mixed methods inquiry within an evaluation context, where the primary purpose is judging a program, policy, or intervention. Quantitative data carry the greater evidential weight — measuring outcomes, effectiveness, and reach — while qualitative data serve as a secondary, explanatory strand that contextualizes and deepens interpretation of the quantitative findings.Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Evaluation-oriented quantitative-priority mixed methods design · Pragmatic Mixed Methods Design. Recuperado em 2026-06-17 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare