ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Análise de Modularidade Dinâmica×Detecção de Comunidades×
ÁreaAnálise de redesAnálise de redes
FamíliaMachine learningProcess / pipeline
Ano de origem20102002–2019 (algorithm family)
Autor originalMucha, P. J.; Porter, M. A.; and colleaguesLouvain: Blondel et al. (2008); Leiden: Traag et al. (2019); Girvan-Newman: Girvan & Newman (2002); Infomap: Rosvall & Bergstrom (2008)
TipoCommunity detection on temporal networksGraph-partitioning / clustering algorithm family
Fonte seminalMucha, P. J., Richardson, T., Macon, K., Porter, M. A., & Onnela, J.-P. (2010). Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. Science, 328(5980), 876–878. DOI ↗Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10), P10008. DOI ↗
Outros nomesdynamic community structure analysis, temporal modularity optimization, evolving community detection, time-varying modularitygraph clustering, network partitioning, Topluluk Tespiti (Louvain, Girvan-Newman, Leiden)
Relacionados55
ResumoDynamic modularity analysis extends the classical modularity framework to networks that evolve over time, detecting communities across a sequence of network snapshots while penalizing unnecessary community changes between time steps. It identifies cohesive groups and tracks how they form, merge, split, or dissolve, giving researchers a principled view of structural change in longitudinal network data.Community detection is a family of graph-partitioning algorithms that discover densely connected sub-groups — communities — within a network. First formalised through the modularity measure by Girvan and Newman (2002), the field advanced rapidly with the Louvain method (Blondel et al., 2008), the Leiden refinement (Traag et al., 2019), and the information-theoretic Infomap approach. All variants answer the same question: which nodes cluster together more tightly among themselves than with the rest of the network?
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Dynamic Modularity Analysis · Community Detection. Recuperado em 2026-06-15 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare