ScholarGate
Assistente

Comparar métodos

Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.

Ponderação Dinâmica por Probabilidade Inversa×Ponderação por Escore de Propensão (PEP / IPW)×
ÁreaInferência causalInferência causal
FamíliaRegression modelRegression model
Ano de origem1986-20001983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Autor originalJames M. Robins and colleaguesRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TipoCausal weighting estimatorCausal inference / reweighting
Fonte seminalRobins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Outros nomesDynamic IPW, Time-varying IPW, Longitudinal IPW, Sequential IPWPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Relacionados46
ResumoDynamic Inverse Probability Weighting (Dynamic IPW) estimates the causal effect of a time-varying treatment sequence by reweighting observed data to mimic a hypothetical randomised trial. Developed by Robins and colleagues in the context of marginal structural models, it handles the challenge that in longitudinal settings, past treatment affects future covariates, which in turn affect future treatment — a feedback loop that standard regression cannot untangle.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateConjunto de dados
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fontes
  3. PUBLISHED

Ir para a pesquisa Baixar slides

ScholarGateComparar métodos: Dynamic Inverse Probability Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. Recuperado em 2026-06-18 de https://scholargate.app/pt/compare