Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Avaliação Digital de Programas× | Análise Curricular× | |
|---|---|---|
| Área | Métodos de campo | Métodos de campo |
| Família | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Ano de origem≠ | 2000s–2010s (formalized alongside proliferation of digital programs and online data) | 1949 (Tyler); 1980s–2000s (Posner's analytic framework) |
| Autor original≠ | Evolving practice; rooted in Rossi, Lipsey & Freeman's evaluation tradition; extended by digital methods scholars in the 2000s–2010s | George J. Posner (systematic framework); Ralph Tyler (foundational rationale) |
| Tipo≠ | Applied evaluation methodology | Qualitative / mixed document analysis |
| Fonte seminal≠ | George, S., & Leidner, D. (2020). Digital Evaluation: Leveraging Digital Data and Methods for Program Assessment. Routledge. link ↗ | Posner, G. J. (2004). Analyzing the Curriculum (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0072823899 |
| Outros nomes | technology-enhanced evaluation, digital evaluation, e-evaluation, online program evaluation | curriculum evaluation, curriculum review, syllabus analysis, curriculum appraisal |
| Relacionados≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Resumo≠ | Digital program evaluation applies the systematic logic of program evaluation to programs that operate fully or partly in digital environments, using digital tools and data — web analytics, online surveys, platform logs, social media metrics, and digital trace data — to assess program reach, implementation fidelity, and outcomes. It retains the core evaluative commitment to rendering a defensible judgment about program merit and worth while exploiting the speed, scale, and granularity that digital data sources offer. Applications span online education, digital public health campaigns, e-government services, and technology-mediated social programs. | Curriculum analysis is a systematic research method for examining the content, structure, goals, and underlying assumptions of educational curricula — including written syllabi, textbooks, lesson plans, and policy documents. By mapping what is taught, how it is sequenced, and what values are embedded, researchers and educators can evaluate alignment with learning objectives, identify gaps or biases, and guide curriculum reform across all levels of education. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|