Comparar métodos

	Intervenção Mista Baseada em Design	Embedded Intervention Mixed Methods
Área	Delineamento de pesquisa	Delineamento de pesquisa
Família	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Ano de origem	2003–2010s (convergence of DBR and mixed methods traditions)	2000s–2010s
Autor original	Design-Based Research Collective; Creswell & Plano Clark (mixed methods framework)	Creswell & Plano Clark (embedded design framework); intervention application developed in health, education, and program evaluation research
Tipo	Mixed methods research design variant	Mixed methods research design
Fonte seminal	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344452	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Outros nomes	DBR intervention mixed methods, design-based intervention study, design experiment with mixed methods, intervention design-based mixed methods	nested intervention mixed methods, embedded experimental mixed methods, mixed methods intervention design with embedded strand, EIMM
Relacionados	6	4
Resumo	Design-based intervention mixed methods is a research design that embeds both quantitative and qualitative data collection within iterative intervention cycles drawn from design-based research (DBR). The approach systematically tests and refines a practical intervention — typically an educational program, curriculum, or organizational solution — while using qualitative data to explain why and how the intervention works, and quantitative data to assess its measurable impact. Iteration between design, testing, and revision is the hallmark of this approach.	Embedded intervention mixed methods is a research design in which a qualitative strand is nested within a primary quantitative intervention (experimental or quasi-experimental) study. The quantitative component tests whether an intervention works; the embedded qualitative component illuminates how and why it works — or does not work — for participants. The two strands run concurrently or sequentially within a single overarching study framework, with integration occurring during interpretation.