Comparar métodos
Examine os métodos selecionados lado a lado; as linhas que diferem ficam destacadas.
| Regras de Associação× | Algoritmo Apriori× | Agrupamento K-means× | Aprendizado Semi-supervisionado× | Comitê de Votação× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Área | Aprendizado de máquina | Aprendizado de máquina | Aprendizado de máquina | Aprendizado de máquina | Aprendizado de máquina |
| Família | Machine learning | Machine learning | Machine learning | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| Ano de origem≠ | 1993 | 1994 | 1967 (formalized 1982) | 1970s–2006 (formalized) | 1990s–2004 |
| Autor original≠ | Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., & Swami, A. | Agrawal, R. & Srikant, R. | MacQueen, J. B.; Lloyd, S. P. | Vapnik, V. N. and others (community of researchers, 1970s–2000s) | Lam & Suen; Kuncheva, L. I. (systematic treatment) |
| Tipo≠ | Unsupervised pattern discovery | Frequent itemset and association rule mining algorithm | Partitional clustering | Learning paradigm | Ensemble (combination of multiple classifiers by vote) |
| Fonte seminal≠ | Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., & Swami, A. (1993). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 207–216. DOI ↗ | Agrawal, R. & Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), 487–499. link ↗ | Lloyd, S. P. (1982). Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28(2), 129–137. DOI ↗ | Chapelle, O., Scholkopf, B., & Zien, A. (Eds.) (2006). Semi-Supervised Learning. MIT Press. ISBN: 978-0-262-03358-9 | Kuncheva, L. I. (2004). Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 978-0-471-21078-8 |
| Outros nomes | market basket analysis, association rule mining, frequent itemset mining, affinity analysis | Apriori, frequent itemset mining, ARL-Apriori, Apriori association mining | k-means clustering, Lloyd's algorithm, k-means partitioning, hard k-means | SSL, semi-supervised machine learning, transductive learning, label-efficient learning | majority voting classifier, hard voting, soft voting ensemble, plurality voting ensemble |
| Relacionados≠ | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Resumo≠ | Association rule learning is an unsupervised technique that discovers co-occurrence patterns — 'if X then Y' implications — within large transactional datasets. Originally formalized by Agrawal, Imielinski, and Swami (1993) for supermarket basket analysis, it is now widely applied in e-commerce recommendation, health informatics, bioinformatics, and behavioral research. | The Apriori algorithm, introduced by Agrawal and Srikant in 1994, is the foundational method for discovering frequent itemsets and association rules in transactional databases. It uses a breadth-first, level-wise search guided by the anti-monotone property of support to efficiently enumerate all item combinations that co-occur above a user-set minimum threshold, then extracts interpretable if-then rules from those patterns. | K-means is a classic unsupervised partitional clustering algorithm that divides a dataset into K non-overlapping groups by iteratively assigning each observation to its nearest centroid and updating centroids as the mean of their assigned points. It is one of the most widely used exploratory tools in machine learning and data analysis. | Semi-supervised learning (SSL) is a machine learning paradigm that trains models using a small set of labeled examples together with a much larger pool of unlabeled data. By leveraging the structure inherent in unlabeled data, SSL achieves accuracy closer to fully supervised models while requiring far fewer costly manual labels — making it practical when labeling is expensive, slow, or resource-constrained. | A voting ensemble trains several diverse classifiers independently and combines their predictions by a vote: hard voting picks the class chosen by the most models, while soft voting averages their class-probability estimates, optionally with per-model weights. The combination usually outperforms any individual member, and requires no additional training after the base models are fitted. |
| ScholarGateConjunto de dados ↗ |
|
|
|
|
|