Collaborative Governance Assessment
Collaborative governance assessment is a framework for analysing arrangements in which public agencies and non-state stakeholders deliberate together to make or implement public policy by consensus. Synthesised by Chris Ansell and Alison Gash in their 2008 article from a meta-analysis of over a hundred cases, it identifies the starting conditions, institutional design and facilitative leadership that feed into an iterative collaborative process and ultimately shape outcomes. The framework treats collaboration not as a single event but as a cycle of face-to-face dialogue, trust-building, shared understanding and intermediate commitments. Its purpose is to explain why some multi-stakeholder partnerships succeed while others stall or collapse.
Przeczytaj pełny opis metody
Zaloguj się na bezpłatne konto, aby przeczytać tę sekcję.
Mapa metod
Sąsiedztwo pokrewnych metod — wybierz węzeł, aby je zgłębić.
Źródła
- Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum032 ↗
Jak cytować tę stronę
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Collaborative Governance Assessment Framework. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/pl/public-administration/collaborative-governance-assessment
Która metoda?
Zestaw tę metodę z najbliższymi jej krewnymi i czytaj je obok siebie — biblioteka kładzie księgi na stole; wybór należy do Ciebie.
- Accountability Mechanism AnalysisPublic Administration↔ porównaj
- Co-Production AssessmentPublic Administration↔ porównaj
- Policy Implementation AnalysisPublic Administration↔ porównaj
- Realist EvaluationPublic Policy↔ porównaj
Cytowana przez
Podobne metody
Widzisz błąd na tej stronie? Zgłoś go lub zaproponuj poprawkę →