ScholarGate
Asystent

Porównaj metody

Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.

Spatial Propensity Score Weighting×Ważenie z wykorzystaniem wyniku skłonności (PSW / IPW)×
DziedzinaWnioskowanie przyczynoweWnioskowanie przyczynowe
RodzinaRegression modelRegression model
Rok powstania2000s–2010s1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
TwórcaExtended from Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (2003) IPTW with spatial adaptations by Keele, Titiunik and others in geographically structured causal designsRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypQuasi-experimental / causal inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
Źródło pierwotneKeele, L., & Titiunik, R. (2015). Geographic Boundaries as Regression Discontinuities. Political Analysis, 23(1), 127-155. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Inne nazwyspatial PSW, geographically weighted propensity score weighting, spatial IPTW, spatially adjusted inverse probability weightingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Pokrewne66
PodsumowanieSpatial propensity score weighting extends inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to settings where units are geographically located and treatment assignment may depend on spatial factors such as location, neighborhood characteristics, or spatial clustering. By incorporating spatial covariates into the propensity score model and adjusting standard errors for spatial autocorrelation, it produces more credible causal estimates from observational geographic data.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateZbiór danych
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Źródła
  3. PUBLISHED

Przejdź do wyszukiwania Pobierz slajdy

ScholarGatePorównaj metody: Spatial Propensity Score Weighting · Propensity Score Weighting. Pobrano 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/pl/compare