Porównaj metody
Przeglądaj wybrane metody obok siebie; wiersze, które się różnią, są wyróżnione.
| Skala Zdolności do Wyczuwania Rynku× | Skala Ambidestrii Innowacji× | |
|---|---|---|
| Dziedzina | Zarządzanie strategiczne | Zarządzanie strategiczne |
| Rodzina | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Rok powstania≠ | 1990 | 1991 |
| Twórca≠ | Ajay Kohli, Bernard Jaworski, and George S. Day | James G. March |
| Typ | Organizational self-report questionnaire | Organizational self-report questionnaire |
| Źródło pierwotne≠ | Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18. DOI ↗ | March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. DOI ↗ |
| Inne nazwy | MSC, Market Intelligence Capability | Ambidexterity Scale, Exploration-Exploitation Scale |
| Pokrewne | 5 | 5 |
| Podsumowanie≠ | Market Sensing Capability (MSC) refers to an organization's ability to systematically gather, interpret, and respond to market information about customers, competitors, and market trends. Building on Kohli and Jaworski's (1990) market orientation construct and George Day's (1994) framework of market-driven organizations, the MSC scale measures three interconnected processes: intelligence generation (acquiring market information), dissemination (sharing information across functions), and responsiveness (acting on market insights). Organizations with strong MSC detect competitive threats earlier, understand customer needs more deeply, and adapt strategies faster than competitors with weaker sensing capabilities. | Innovation Ambidexterity—the organizational capacity to simultaneously engage in exploration (pursuing radical, novel innovations) and exploitation (improving and extending existing products and processes)—is fundamental to sustained competitive advantage. March (1991) formalized this trade-off in Organization Science, arguing that organizations must balance the two to survive and thrive. Exploration alone leads to variety but insufficient returns; exploitation alone leads to competence traps and vulnerability to disruption. This scale, operationalized by He and Wong (2004) and extended by Jansen et al. (2006), measures organizational capability in both domains and the degree to which firms balance competing innovation imperatives. |
| ScholarGateZbiór danych ↗ |
|
|