ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineProgram-model fidelity scales

Case Management Fidelity Assessment

Case management fidelity assessment measures how closely a case-management or care-coordination program matches the defined model it claims to implement — such as assertive community treatment, intensive case management, or a strengths model — by rating specific structural and process dimensions on anchored scales and aggregating them into an overall fidelity score. The approach was established by the Dartmouth tradition of Teague, Bond, and Drake, whose Assertive Community Treatment fidelity scale became the template for measuring whether a program is delivering its model in practice or only in name.

Åpne i MethodMindSnartBruk, sammenlign, få veiledning
Verktøy og ressurser
Last ned lysbilder
Lær og utforsk
VideoSnart

Les hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.

Logg inn

Metodekart

Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.

Kilder

  1. Teague, G. B., Bond, G. R., & Drake, R. E. (1998). Program fidelity in assertive community treatment: Development and use of a measure. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68(2), 216–232. DOI: 10.1037/h0080331
  2. Bond, G. R., Evans, L., Salyers, M. P., Williams, J., & Kim, H. W. (2000). Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation. Mental Health Services Research, 2(2), 75–87. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010153020697

Slik siterer du denne siden

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Fidelity Assessment of Case Management and Care Coordination Models. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/social-work/case-management-fidelity

Hvilken metode?

Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.

Sammenlign side om side

Referert av

ScholarGateCase Management Fidelity Assessment (Fidelity Assessment of Case Management and Care Coordination Models). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/no/social-work/case-management-fidelity · Datasett: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026