Summative Evaluation
Summative evaluation is evaluation conducted to render an overall judgement of a program, policy or product — its merit, worth, effectiveness or impact — typically after it has been implemented or has matured. Named by Michael Scriven in his 1967 essay 'The Methodology of Evaluation' as the counterpart to formative evaluation, its purpose is to inform consequential decisions: whether to continue, expand, replicate, defund or certify an intervention. It addresses the bottom-line question 'did it work, and was it worth it?' for audiences such as funders, policymakers and the public.
Les hele metoden
Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.
Metodekart
Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.
Kilder
- Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago: Rand McNally. ISBN: 9780528616600
Slik siterer du denne siden
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Summative Evaluation of Program Merit and Worth. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/public-policy/summative-evaluation
Hvilken metode?
Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.
- Motfaktisk effektvurdering (CIE)Kausal inferens↔ sammenlign
- Formative EvaluationPublic Policy↔ sammenlign
- Impact Evaluation DesignPublic Policy↔ sammenlign
- Process EvaluationPublic Policy↔ sammenlign
Referert av
Lignende metoder
Funnet en feil på denne siden? Rapporter eller foreslå en rettelse →