ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineIndirect questioning techniques

List Experiment

The list experiment, also called the item count technique, is a survey design that measures the prevalence of a sensitive attitude or behavior without ever requiring any respondent to directly disclose it. Respondents are randomly split into two groups: a control group sees a list of innocuous items and reports only how many apply to them, while a treatment group sees the same list plus one sensitive item. Because respondents report only a count, no individual answer reveals their stance on the sensitive item, and the difference in average counts between the groups estimates the proportion holding the sensitive trait.

Åpne i MethodMindSnartBruk, sammenlign, få veiledning
Verktøy og ressurser
Last ned lysbilder
Lær og utforsk
VideoSnart

Les hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.

Logg inn

Metodekart

Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.

Kilder

  1. Imai, K. (2011). Multivariate Regression Analysis for the Item Count Technique. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(494), 407–416. DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2011.ap10415
  2. Blair, G., & Imai, K. (2012). Statistical Analysis of List Experiments. Political Analysis, 20(1), 47–77. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpr048
  3. Glynn, A. N. (2013). What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum? Design and Analysis of the List Experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(S1), 159–172. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfs070

Slik siterer du denne siden

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). List Experiment (Item Count Technique). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/political-science/list-experiment

Hvilken metode?

Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.

Sammenlign side om side

Referert av

ScholarGateList Experiment (List Experiment (Item Count Technique)). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/no/political-science/list-experiment · Datasett: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026