ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineField experimental designs

Audit Experiment

An audit experiment, also called a correspondence or field audit study, sends matched but fictitious requests to real-world targets — such as legislators, landlords, or employers — while randomizing a single treatment cue, then compares the rate and quality of responses. In political science the canonical design follows Butler and Broockman's 2011 study of U.S. state legislators, which varied the putative race signaled by a constituent's name to measure discrimination in responsiveness.

Åpne i MethodMindSnartBruk, sammenlign, få veiledning
Verktøy og ressurser
Last ned lysbilder
Lær og utforsk
VideoSnart

Les hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.

Logg inn

Metodekart

Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.

Kilder

  1. Butler, D. M., & Broockman, D. E. (2011). Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 463–477. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00515.x
  2. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013. DOI: 10.1257/0002828042002561

Slik siterer du denne siden

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Audit Experiment (Correspondence / Field Audit Study). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/political-science/audit-experiment

Hvilken metode?

Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.

Sammenlign side om side

Referert av

ScholarGateAudit Experiment (Audit Experiment (Correspondence / Field Audit Study)). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/no/political-science/audit-experiment · Datasett: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026