Spatial Conflict Analysis
Spatial conflict analysis models armed conflict while taking geography seriously: conflict is not randomly scattered but clusters in space, and a place's risk depends on its neighbors. Building on georeferenced data and spatial-statistical methods — as in Ward and Gleditsch's (2002) MCMC approach to the spatial context of war and peace — it uses spatial weights, tests for spatial autocorrelation, and fits spatial regression models so that conflict, peace, and their predictors are analyzed as interdependent across locations rather than as isolated observations.
Les hele metoden
Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.
Metodekart
Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.
Kilder
- Ward, M. D., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2002). Location, location, location: An MCMC approach to modeling the spatial context of war and peace. Political Analysis, 10(3), 244–260. DOI: 10.1093/pan/10.3.244 ↗
Slik siterer du denne siden
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Spatial Analysis and Modeling of Armed Conflict. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/international-relations/spatial-conflict-analysis
Hvilken metode?
Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.
- Conflict Diffusion AnalysisInternational Relations↔ sammenlign
- Romlig regresjon (romlig etterslep og romlige feilmodeller)Økonometri↔ sammenlign
- UCDP Conflict Data AnalysisInternational Relations↔ sammenlign
Referert av
Lignende metoder
Relaterte referansebegreper
Funnet en feil på denne siden? Rapporter eller foreslå en rettelse →