Gå til innholdScholarGate
BibliotekMitt bibliotekPultenReview StudioAssistent
Logg inn
E-Government Adoption Scale/Bevis
Metodebevisregister

E-Government Adoption Scale

The E-Government Adoption Scale (EGAS) measures citizens' willingness to adopt and use digital government services (e-permits, e-tax, e-voting, e-tourism information services, online licensing) based on Technology Acceptance Model principles (Venkatesh & Davis, 2000) extended to government contexts (Belanger et al., 2005). It operationalizes key adoption drivers: perceived usefulness, ease of use, trust in government, security concerns, and technical support. Essential for government agencies, tourism authorities, and public service digital transformation initiatives seeking to understand and overcome citizen barriers to e-service adoption.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Kilderegister

Siteringer kopiert ordrett fra metodens kilderegister. Ingen påstandsnivåverifisering er underforstått fra dem.

E-Government Adoption Scale (EGAS)
Taksonomisk metoderegister · process-pipeline / tourism-management
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. · DOI 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Belanger, F., Carter, L., & Casper, J. (2005). Citizen adoption of e-government services. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 109c. · URL
  • Alomari, M., Sandhu, K., & Woods, P. (2012). Exploring citizen perceptions of barriers and drivers influencing the adoption of e-government services. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 14(4), 36-48. · URL
  • Oliveira, T., Martins, R., Sarker, S., & Thomas, M. (2016). Information and communication technology adoption across the global south. Journal of Global Information Management, 24(2), 1-22. · URL
Åpne full metode

Kuraterte påstander

Påstander lagret i bevishovedboken, hver med sin egen vurdering.

Ingen kuraterte påstander ennå

Denne visningen finner ikke opp en påstandsvurdering når hovedboken ikke har noen.

Relaterte metoder

Generert fra metodegrafen og vist som maskinforslåtte relasjoner – ingen bevispåstand er underforstått.

Same method familyCitizen Satisfaction Surveymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyDestination Image Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPerceived Value Scale for Tourismmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPublic Service Motivation Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyTourist Satisfaction Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Bevisstatus

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Kilder

4 registrerte siteringer, kopiert fra metodens kilderegister.

Handlinger

Åpne metodeside
ScholarGate

Et innholdsfokusert oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder — hva hver metode er, hvordan den fungerer, og hvor den kommer fra.

Åpne data (CC-BY)

Oppdag

  • Bibliotek
  • Søk i metoder…
  • Bla etter fagfelt
  • Fagfelt
  • Reise
  • Sammenlign
  • Hvilken metode?

Referanse

  • Fagområder
  • Atlas
  • Ordliste
  • Metodikk
  • Filosofi

Arbeidsområde

  • Mitt bibliotek
  • Pulten
  • Chat

Selskap

  • Om
  • Priser
  • Kontakt
  • Foreslå en metode

Oppføringene er sammenstilt fra publiserte kilder til referansebruk. Å kontrollere at informasjonen er korrekt og egnet for ditt eget bruk, er fremdeles ditt eget ansvar.

© 2026 ScholarGate · Et oppslagsbibliotek for forskningsmetoder
  • Personvern
  • Informasjonskapsler
  • Vilkår
  • Slett konto