ScholarGate
Assistent
Process / pipelineParticipatory monitoring and evaluation

Most Significant Change for Development

The Most Significant Change (MSC) technique is a participatory, story-based approach to monitoring and evaluating development programmes that dispenses with predefined indicators. Developed by Rick Davies and elaborated with Jess Dart in their widely used 2005 guide, it works by systematically collecting stories of significant change from those closest to a programme and then filtering and selecting the most significant of them through deliberative panels at successive levels of the organisational hierarchy. The result is a structured, dialogical account of what stakeholders themselves judge to be the most important outcomes of an intervention.

Åpne i MethodMindSnartBruk, sammenlign, få veiledning
Verktøy og ressurser
Last ned lysbilder
Lær og utforsk
VideoSnart

Les hele metoden

Kun for medlemmer

Logg inn med en gratis konto for å lese denne delen.

Logg inn

Metodekart

Nabolaget av beslektede metoder — velg en node for å utforske.

Kilder

  1. Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2005). The 'Most Significant Change' (MSC) Technique: A Guide to Its Use. CARE International, Oxfam, et al. link
  2. Dart, J., & Davies, R. (2003). A Dialogical, Story-Based Evaluation Tool: The Most Significant Change Technique. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(2), 137-155. DOI: 10.1177/109821400302400202

Slik siterer du denne siden

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Most Significant Change (MSC) Technique in Development. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/no/development-studies/most-significant-change-development

Hvilken metode?

Sett denne metoden ved siden av sin nærmeste slektning og les dem side om side — biblioteket legger bøkene på bordet; valget er ditt.

Sammenlign side om side

Referert av

ScholarGateMost Significant Change for Development (Most Significant Change (MSC) Technique in Development). Hentet 2026-06-24 fra https://scholargate.app/no/development-studies/most-significant-change-development · Datasett: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026