Sammenlign metoder
Gjennomgå de valgte metodene side om side; rader som avviker, er uthevet.
| Forvirringsmatrise× | Nøyaktighet× | Gjenkalling (Sensitivitet)× | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fagfelt | Modellevaluering | Modellevaluering | Modellevaluering |
| Familie | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| Opprinnelsesår | 20th century | 20th century | 20th century |
| Opphavsperson≠ | Statistical foundations | Historical statistical foundations | Historical statistical foundations |
| Type≠ | Evaluation visualization | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Opprinnelig kilde≠ | Everitt, B. S., & Hothorn, T. (2005). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC. link ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | Error Matrix, Contingency Table | Overall Accuracy, Correct Classification Rate | Sensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPR |
| Relaterte | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Sammendrag≠ | The confusion matrix is a table that displays the counts of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives. It provides a complete picture of where a classifier makes correct and incorrect predictions, enabling calculation of all other classification metrics. | Accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions among the total number of predictions made by a classification model. It is the most intuitive performance metric and measures how often the classifier makes correct predictions overall, regardless of class. | Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly. |
| ScholarGateDatasett ↗ |
|
|
|