Sammenlign metoder

	Boosting	Regularisert Boosting	Robust Gradient Boosting
Fagfelt	Maskinlæring	Maskinlæring	Maskinlæring
Familie	Machine learning	Machine learning	Machine learning
Opprinnelsesår	1990–1997	2001–2016	2001
Opphavsperson	Schapire, R. E.; Freund, Y.	Friedman, J. H.; extended by Chen & Guestrin	Friedman, J. H. (with Huber loss from Huber, P. J.)
Type	Sequential ensemble (iterative reweighting)	Regularized ensemble (boosting with shrinkage/penalty)	Ensemble (boosted trees with robust loss)
Opprinnelig kilde	Freund, Y. & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1), 119–139.	Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232.	Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232.
Alias	AdaBoost, gradient boosting, iterative reweighting ensemble, sequential ensemble	shrinkage boosting, penalized boosting, regularized gradient boosting, L1/L2 boosting	gradient boosting with Huber loss, robust GBM, outlier-robust boosting, robust gradient-boosted trees
Relaterte	6	5	6
Sammendrag	Boosting is a sequential ensemble technique that converts many simple, barely-better-than-chance learners into a single highly accurate model by repeatedly focusing training on the examples that previous learners got wrong, then combining all learners with weights proportional to their individual accuracy.	Regularized boosting extends gradient boosting by adding explicit controls — shrinkage (learning rate), L1/L2 weight penalties, subsampling, and tree-complexity limits — to the objective function and the update rule. These constraints reduce overfitting, stabilise the model on noisy or small datasets, and are the core reason why systems such as XGBoost and LightGBM consistently outperform vanilla boosting on real-world tabular benchmarks.	Robust Gradient Boosting is gradient boosting trained with outlier-resistant loss functions — most commonly the Huber loss or quantile (pinball) loss — instead of squared-error loss. Proposed in Friedman's seminal 2001 paper, this variant produces predictions far less distorted by extreme values or contaminated labels, while retaining the full predictive power of gradient-boosted trees.