Sammenlign metoder

	Bayesiansk vurdering av diskriminant validitet	Begrepsvaliditet
Fagfelt	Psykometri	Psykometri
Familie	Latent structure	Latent structure
Opprinnelsesår	2020 (Bayesian HTMT formalization); 1959 (discriminant validity concept)	1955
Opphavsperson	Adaptation of Campbell & Fiske (1959) discriminant validity into Bayesian CFA framework; Bayesian HTMT formalization by Garnier-Villarreal & Jorgensen (2020)	Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
Type	Validity assessment	Validity evaluation framework
Opprinnelig kilde	Garnier-Villarreal, M. & Jorgensen, T. D. (2020). Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood. Psychological Methods, 25(1), 46–70.	Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
Alias	Bayesian HTMT, Bayesian HTMTb, Bayesian discriminant evidence, Bayesian CFA discriminant validity	construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Relaterte	6	6
Sammendrag	Bayesian discriminant validity assessment evaluates whether two theoretically distinct latent constructs are empirically separable, using posterior distributions and credible intervals rather than single-point null-hypothesis tests. It is applied within Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis or via the Bayesian heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMTb) to determine whether constructs measuring different traits are sufficiently differentiated.	Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.