Moralizing Gods Database Analysis
Moralizing gods database analysis is a cross-cultural quantitative method that codes the presence of moralizing or 'big' supernatural enforcers and measures of social complexity across many historical polities over time, then models their relationship. The exemplary infrastructure is the Seshat: Global History Databank, introduced by Peter Turchin and colleagues in 2015, which records hundreds of polities on standardized variables - population, territory, hierarchy, infrastructure, information systems, and religious features - with explicit sources and uncertainty codes. A high-profile 2019 Nature paper using Seshat data argued that complex societies tend to precede moralizing gods; that paper was retracted in 2021 over its treatment of missing data. The method is therefore best understood not as a settled finding but as a databank-driven analytical pipeline whose results depend critically on coding decisions, missing-data handling, and modeling of temporal and phylogenetic dependence.
Lees de volledige methode
Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.
Methodenkaart
De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.
Bronnen
- Turchin, P., Brennan, R., Currie, T., et al. (2015). Seshat: The Global History Databank. Cliodynamics: The Journal of Quantitative History and Cultural Evolution, 6(1), 77-107. DOI: 10.21237/C7clio6127917 ↗
- Whitehouse, H., et al. (2019). Complex societies precede moralizing gods throughout world history. Nature, 568(7751), 226-229. [RETRACTED 2021]. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1043-4 ↗
- Whitehouse, H., et al. (2021). Retraction Note: Complex societies precede moralizing gods throughout world history. Nature, 595, E9. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03656-3 ↗
Deze pagina citeren
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Cross-Cultural Database Analysis of Moralizing Gods and Social Complexity. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/religious-studies/moralizing-gods-database-analysis
Welke methode?
Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.
- Comparative Method in ReligionReligious Studies↔ vergelijken
- Minimally Counterintuitive RecallReligious Studies↔ vergelijken
- Ritual Density CodingReligious Studies↔ vergelijken
Geciteerd door
Vergelijkbare methoden
Een fout op deze pagina gezien? Meld het of stel een correctie voor →