Implicit Religion Measurement
Implicit religion measurement is a method for identifying and assessing religious-like commitments in settings and lives that look entirely secular. It joins two traditions: Thomas Luckmann's The Invisible Religion (1967), which argued that in modern society religion has not vanished but migrated into a privatized 'sacred cosmos' outside the churches, and Edward Bailey's program of implicit religion, which gave the idea an empirical, fieldwork-based method. Bailey proposed three working criteria - commitments, integrating foci, and intensive concerns - by which a researcher can detect the quasi-religious in ostensibly non-religious activities such as life in a pub, devotion to a football club, patriotism, work, or consumption. The method combines ethnography and interviews to locate these functional equivalents of religion and to gauge how strongly they organize people's lives, treating apparently secular commitments as a site where the sacred persists in disguised form.
Lees de volledige methode
Log in met een gratis account om dit onderdeel te lezen.
Methodenkaart
De omgeving van verwante methoden — selecteer een knooppunt om te verkennen.
Bronnen
- Bailey, E. I. (1998). Implicit Religion in Contemporary Society. Leuven: Peeters. ISBN: 9789042909632
- Luckmann, T. (1967). The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. New York: Macmillan. ISBN: 9780025767003
Deze pagina citeren
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Implicit (Invisible) Religion Identification and Measurement. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/nl/religious-studies/implicit-religion-measurement
Welke methode?
Plaats deze methode naast haar naaste verwanten en lees ze naast elkaar — de bibliotheek legt de boeken op tafel; de keuze is aan u.
- Conversion Narrative AnalysisReligious Studies↔ vergelijken
- Ethnography of ReligionReligious Studies↔ vergelijken
- Phenomenology of ReligionReligious Studies↔ vergelijken
Geciteerd door
Vergelijkbare methoden
Een fout op deze pagina gezien? Meld het of stel een correctie voor →