Methodenbewijsdossier

Collaborative Governance Assessment

Collaborative governance assessment is a framework for analysing arrangements in which public agencies and non-state stakeholders deliberate together to make or implement public policy by consensus. Synthesised by Chris Ansell and Alison Gash in their 2008 article from a meta-analysis of over a hundred cases, it identifies the starting conditions, institutional design and facilitative leadership that feed into an iterative collaborative process and ultimately shape outcomes. The framework treats collaboration not as a single event but as a cycle of face-to-face dialogue, trust-building, shared understanding and intermediate commitments. Its purpose is to explain why some multi-stakeholder partnerships succeed while others stall or collapse.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bronrecord

Citaten letterlijk overgenomen uit het bronrecord van de methode. Hieruit wordt geen verificatie op claimniveau afgeleid.

Collaborative Governance Assessment Framework

Taxonomisch methodendossier · process-pipeline / public-administration

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. · DOI 10.1093/jopart/mum032

Volledige methode openen

Gecureerde claims

Claims opgeslagen in het bewijsregister, elk met zijn eigen beoordeling.

Nog geen gecureerde claims

Deze weergave verzint geen claimbeoordeling als het register er geen heeft.

Gerelateerde methoden

Gegenereerd uit de methodegraaf en getoond als machinaal voorgestelde relaties — er wordt geen bewijsclaim afgeleid.

Same method familyAccountability Mechanism Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCo-Production Assessmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPolicy Implementation Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRealist Evaluationmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.