ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Risicomaatstaven voor de staart (Expected Shortfall, spectrale, expectiel)×Kwantielregressie×
VakgebiedFinancieringEconometrie
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Jaar van ontstaan19991978
GrondleggerArtzner, Delbaen, Eber & Heath (coherent risk axioms); Acerbi & Tasche (Expected Shortfall)Koenker & Bassett
TypeCoherent tail risk measureConditional quantile regression
Oorspronkelijke bronArtzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M. & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent Measures of Risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228. DOI ↗Koenker, R. & Bassett, G., Jr. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50. DOI ↗
Aliassenexpected shortfall, conditional value at risk, CVaR, spectral risk measureconditional quantile regression, regression quantiles, Kantil Regresyon
Verwant55
SamenvattingTail risk measures quantify the loss distribution beyond Value-at-Risk (VaR). Expected Shortfall — the expected loss given that VaR is exceeded — is the leading coherent risk measure, formalised by Artzner, Delbaen, Eber and Heath (1999) and shown to be coherent by Acerbi and Tasche (2002). Spectral and expectile-based measures generalise it.Quantile regression models conditional quantiles of an outcome - the median, the 25th or 75th percentile, and so on - rather than the conditional mean that OLS targets. Introduced by Koenker and Bassett in 1978, it reveals how predictors act across the whole distribution, including its tails.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Tail Risk Measures · Quantile Regression. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare