ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Risicomaatstaven voor de staart (Expected Shortfall, spectrale, expectiel)×Gewone Kleinste Kwadraten (GKK) Regressie×
VakgebiedFinancieringEconometrie
FamilieRegression modelRegression model
Jaar van ontstaan19992019
GrondleggerArtzner, Delbaen, Eber & Heath (coherent risk axioms); Acerbi & Tasche (Expected Shortfall)Wooldridge (textbook treatment); classical least squares
TypeCoherent tail risk measureLinear regression
Oorspronkelijke bronArtzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M. & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent Measures of Risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228. DOI ↗Wooldridge, J. M. (2019). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1337558860
Aliassenexpected shortfall, conditional value at risk, CVaR, spectral risk measureordinary least squares, classical linear regression, linear regression, en küçük kareler regresyonu
Verwant55
SamenvattingTail risk measures quantify the loss distribution beyond Value-at-Risk (VaR). Expected Shortfall — the expected loss given that VaR is exceeded — is the leading coherent risk measure, formalised by Artzner, Delbaen, Eber and Heath (1999) and shown to be coherent by Acerbi and Tasche (2002). Spectral and expectile-based measures generalise it.Ordinary Least Squares is the classical linear regression method that explains a continuous outcome as a linear combination of predictors. It estimates the coefficients by minimising the sum of squared residuals, and under the Gauss-Markov assumptions these estimates are the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE).
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Tail Risk Measures · OLS Regression. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-18 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare