Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Structurele vergelijkingsmodellering (SEM)× | Confirmatory factor analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Statistiek | Psychometrie |
| Familie | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1970 | 1969 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Karl Jöreskog (LISREL framework, 1970s) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Type≠ | Latent variable / causal modeling | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1473756540 | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (SEM), structural equation modelling, covariance structure analysis, latent variable modeling | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Verwant≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Structural equation modeling is a multivariate statistical framework that simultaneously estimates a measurement model — relating observed indicators to latent constructs — and a structural model specifying directional or reciprocal relationships among those constructs. Rooted in the LISREL tradition developed by Karl Jöreskog in the 1970s, SEM is the standard tool for testing complex theoretical models in the social, behavioural, and management sciences. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|