Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Gematchede Fase II Klinische Studie× | Propensity Score Matching× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Epidemiologie | Onderzoeksstatistiek |
| Familie | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1960s–1980s (formalized with Simon optimal designs, 1989) | 1983 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Gehan (1961) for Phase II designs; matching frameworks adapted from case-control methodology | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Type≠ | Controlled clinical trial design | Method |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Gehan, E. A. (1961). The determination of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 13(4), 346–353. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | matched Phase II trial, historically matched Phase II study, propensity-matched Phase II trial, externally controlled Phase II trial | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Verwant≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Samenvatting≠ | A matched Phase II clinical trial is a single-arm or small-controlled early-efficacy study in which treated patients are paired with matched controls — drawn from historical databases, registries, or concurrent external cohorts — on key prognostic variables such as age, disease stage, and performance status. This design allows preliminary efficacy assessment without a concurrent randomized arm, trading randomization for feasibility while partially controlling for confounding through the matching process. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|