ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

Marginaal Structureel Model in Onderwijsonderzoek×Propensity Score Matching×
VakgebiedCausale inferentieOnderzoeksstatistiek
FamilieRegression modelProcess / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan2000 (method); 2006 (canonical education application)1983
GrondleggerJames M. Robins, Miguel A. Hernán, Babette Brumback (epidemiology); Guanglei Hong & Stephen Raudenbush (education application)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypeCausal inference / weighted regression modelMethod
Oorspronkelijke bronRobins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
AliassenMSM, marginal structural model, MSM with inverse probability weighting, IPW-MSMPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Verwant53
SamenvattingA marginal structural model (MSM) is a causal inference technique that uses inverse probability weighting to estimate the effect of a treatment or educational intervention that changes over time. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) in epidemiology and brought into education by Hong and Raudenbush (2006), MSMs handle time-varying confounding — a challenge that conventional regression cannot resolve.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: Marginal structural model in education research · Propensity Score Matching. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-19 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare