Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Lokale Gemiddelde Behandelingsuitkomst (LATE / CACE)× | Frontdoor Adjustment (Frontdoor Criterion)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Causale inferentie | Causale inferentie |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1994 | 1995 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Imbens & Angrist (1994); Angrist, Imbens & Rubin (1996) | Judea Pearl |
| Type≠ | Instrumental-variable causal estimand | Causal identification (graphical adjustment) |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994). Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 62(2), 467-475. DOI ↗ | Pearl, J. (1995). Causal Diagrams for Empirical Research. Biometrika, 82(4), 669-688. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen | LATE, CACE, complier average causal effect, Yerel Ortalama Tedavi Etkisi (LATE / CACE) | frontdoor criterion, Pearl's frontdoor adjustment, frontdoor formula, Ön Kapı Düzenlemesi (Frontdoor Adjustment) |
| Verwant≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | The Local Average Treatment Effect is an instrumental-variable estimand, introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) and formalised with Rubin (1996), that recovers the average treatment effect for the subpopulation of compliers — units whose treatment status is actually moved by the instrument. It is closely tied to compliance analysis. | Frontdoor adjustment is Judea Pearl's graphical identification strategy, introduced in 1995, that recovers the causal effect of a treatment on an outcome through a fully mediating variable even when an unobserved confounder sits between the treatment and the outcome. It is the go-to tool when the backdoor criterion cannot be satisfied because the confounder is unmeasured. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|