Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Design in Education Research× | Difference-in-Differences (DiD)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied≠ | Causale inferentie | Econometrie |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | Late 1990s–2000s | 1994 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Imbens & Lemieux (2008); applied in education by Jacob & Lefgren (2004) and Angrist & Lavy (1999) | Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment) |
| Type≠ | Quasi-experimental / causal inference | Causal inference / panel regression |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗ | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355 |
| Aliassen≠ | Fuzzy RDD, Fuzzy RD, Imperfect RDD, Non-sharp RD | diff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff) |
| Verwant≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Design (Fuzzy RDD) is a quasi-experimental causal method that exploits a known score threshold — such as a test cutoff — to estimate the effect of a program or intervention when assignment is imperfect. Widely used in education research to evaluate summer school, remedial programs, scholarships, and class-size rules, it uses two-stage least squares to recover a local average treatment effect for students near the threshold. | Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|