Methoden vergelijken
Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.
| Fully Modified OLS (FMOLS) Schatter× | ARDL Bounds Test× | |
|---|---|---|
| Vakgebied | Econometrie | Econometrie |
| Familie | Regression model | Regression model |
| Jaar van ontstaan≠ | 1990 | 2001 |
| Grondlegger≠ | Phillips & Hansen (time series); Pedroni (heterogeneous panels) | Pesaran, Shin & Smith |
| Type≠ | Cointegrating regression estimator | Cointegration test / Autoregressive distributed lag model |
| Oorspronkelijke bron≠ | Phillips, P. C. B. & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I(1) Processes. Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99–125. DOI ↗ | Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. DOI ↗ |
| Aliassen≠ | fully modified OLS, Phillips-Hansen FMOLS, Tam Düzeltilmiş OLS (FMOLS) | Pesaran bounds test, bounds testing approach, ARDL cointegration test, ARDL Sınır Testi (Pesaran Bounds Test) |
| Verwant≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Samenvatting≠ | Fully Modified OLS, introduced by Phillips and Hansen (1990), estimates the long-run coefficients of a cointegrating relationship among I(1) variables. It applies a semi-parametric correction to ordinary least squares to remove the bias that endogeneity and serial correlation otherwise induce in cointegrated time series or panel data. | The ARDL bounds test is an autoregressive distributed lag method that tests for a cointegrating (long-run level) relationship between time series, introduced by Pesaran, Shin and Smith in 2001. Unlike the Johansen procedure, it remains valid whether the variables are I(0), I(1) or a mix of the two, and it is more reliable than Johansen in small samples of roughly 30 to 80 observations. |
| ScholarGateGegevensset ↗ |
|
|