Methoden vergelijken

	Constructvaliditeit in Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT)	Convergente Validiteit voor Gecomputeriseerde Adaptieve Tests
Vakgebied	Psychometrie	Psychometrie
Familie	Latent structure	Latent structure
Jaar van ontstaan	1989–2000s	1989–2000
Grondlegger	Samuel Messick (unified validity framework); CAT application formalized by Wainer, van der Linden, and colleagues	Samuel Messick (validity framework); Wainer and colleagues (CAT context)
Type	Validity evaluation / psychometric evidence gathering	Validity evidence / construct validation
Oorspronkelijke bron	Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education / Macmillan.	Wainer, H. (Ed.). (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805835113
Aliassen	CAT construct validity, adaptive test construct validation, CAT validity evidence, construct validity evidence in CAT	CAT convergent validity, adaptive test construct validation, CAT validity evidence, convergent validity in CAT
Verwant	6	5
Samenvatting	Construct validity in computerized adaptive testing evaluates whether the latent trait estimates produced by a CAT instrument genuinely measure the intended psychological or educational construct. Because adaptive algorithms select items individually for each examinee, the validity evidence gathered must account for the variable item exposure and the IRT-based scoring that are unique to CAT administrations.	Convergent validity assessment for computerized adaptive tests (CATs) examines whether the ability or trait estimates produced by an adaptive algorithm correlate substantially with scores from other measures of the same construct. Because each examinee receives a different subset of items in a CAT, demonstrating that the resulting scores still converge with theoretically related external measures is a critical step in establishing construct validity evidence.