Methoden vergelijken

	Vergelijkende Reflexieve Thematische Analyse	Framework Analysis
Vakgebied	Kwalitatief	Kwalitatief
Familie	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Jaar van ontstaan	2006 (reflexive TA); comparative application formalised ~2019–2021	1994
Grondlegger	Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke	Jane Ritchie & Liz Spencer (National Centre for Social Research, UK)
Type	Qualitative analytic approach	Qualitative research method
Oorspronkelijke bron	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 978-1473953406	Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analysing Qualitative Data (pp. 173–194). Routledge.
Aliassen	Comparative RTA, cross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, comparative qualitative thematic comparison	FA, Framework Method, Framework Approach, Applied Qualitative Analysis
Verwant	4	6
Samenvatting	Comparative Reflexive Thematic Analysis (CRTA) applies Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework to data drawn from two or more distinct groups, time points, or contexts, with the explicit goal of contrasting thematic patterns across those groups. The reflexive element means the analyst continuously interrogates how their own perspectives and positioning shape the themes they construct, while the comparative element directs attention to differences and similarities between data sets rather than seeking a single unified account.	Framework Analysis is a structured qualitative method developed by Jane Ritchie and Liz Spencer at the UK National Centre for Social Research in 1994. It organises qualitative data into a thematic matrix — the analytical framework — enabling systematic comparison across participants and themes. Originally designed for applied policy research with specific questions and timelines, it is now widely used in health services, social policy, and management research where transparency and rigorous cross-case comparison are essential.