ScholarGate
Assistent

Methoden vergelijken

Bekijk de geselecteerde methoden naast elkaar; rijen die verschillen zijn gemarkeerd.

ARIMA (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average) Model×Bootstrap-inferentie×Diebold-Mariano Test op Gelijke Voorspellende Nauwkeurigheid×
VakgebiedEconometrieStatistiekEconometrie
FamilieRegression modelRegression modelHypothesis test
Jaar van ontstaan201519791995
GrondleggerBox & Jenkins (Box-Jenkins methodology)Bradley EfronFrancis Diebold & Roberto Mariano
TypeUnivariate time-series modelResampling-based inferenceNon-parametric forecast comparison test
Oorspronkelijke bronBox, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C. & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (5th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118675021Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. Annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1-26. DOI ↗Diebold, F. X., & Mariano, R. S. (1995). Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(3), 253–263. DOI ↗
AliassenBox-Jenkins model, ARIMA(p,d,q), ARIMA Modelibootstrap, bootstrap resampling, nonparametric bootstrap, Bootstrap ÇıkarımıDM Test, Test of Equal Forecast Accuracy, Diebold-Mariano Forecast Comparison Test, Tahmin Doğruluğu Eşitliği Testi
Verwant553
SamenvattingARIMA is a univariate time-series forecasting model that combines autoregressive, integrated (differencing), and moving-average components to predict a single continuous series from its own past. It is the centrepiece of the Box-Jenkins methodology set out in Box, Jenkins, Reinsel & Ljung's Time Series Analysis (5th ed., 2015).Bootstrap inference, introduced by Bradley Efron in 1979, estimates the sampling distribution of a statistic by repeatedly resampling the observed data with replacement. It requires no distributional assumption and produces reliable confidence intervals even in small samples.The Diebold-Mariano (DM) test, introduced by Diebold and Mariano in 1995, is a widely used non-parametric procedure for formally comparing the predictive accuracy of two competing forecasting models. It evaluates whether the difference in forecast errors between two models is statistically significant, without requiring nested models or specific distributional assumptions about the forecasts, making it broadly applicable across economics, finance, and time-series analysis.
ScholarGateGegevensset
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Bronnen
  3. PUBLISHED

Naar zoeken Dia's downloaden

ScholarGateMethoden vergelijken: ARIMA · Bootstrap Inference · Diebold-Mariano Test. Geraadpleegd op 2026-06-19 via https://scholargate.app/nl/compare