De meest geraadpleegde fundamentele methoden van dit onderwerp, in de volgorde waarin ze zijn ontwikkeld — een plek om te beginnen als u hier nieuw bent.
I
Vergelijkende rechtsanalyseLate 19th century; formalised 1900door Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (early conceptualisation); Raymond Saleilles and Édouard Lambert (modern discipline, 1900 Paris Congress)
II
Juridische inhoudsanalyse1940s–1970s (applied systematically to legal texts)door Interdisciplinary; foundational content analysis by Harold Lasswell (1940s); applied to legal texts by empirical legal scholars from the 1970s onward
III
Vergelijkend doctrinal juridisch onderzoek19th century origins; modern systematic form 1960s–1998door Rooted in classical comparative law (Anselm von Feuerbach, early 19th c.); systematised by Zweigert & Kötz (1998)
IV
Longitudinale vergelijkende rechtsanalyseLate 20th century (comparative law foundational texts 1960s–1998; longitudinal integration from 1990s onward)door Konrad Zweigert and Hein Kotz (comparative law foundation); longitudinal dimension integrated in socio-legal and legal history scholarship
Kritisch-doctrineel juridisch onderzoek1970s–1980s (Critical Legal Studies movement; applied to doctrinal method from 1980s onward)door Synthesized from Traditional Doctrinal Legal Research and Critical Legal Studies (Roberto Unger, Duncan Kennedy, and others)
VII
Evaluatiegerichte juridische inhoudsanalyseLate 20th century; evaluation-focused applications emerged prominently from the 1990s onwarddoor Builds on Klaus Krippendorff's content analysis framework and legal scholarship traditions
VIII
Case Law AnalysisMedieval English common law; academic formalisation 19th–20th centurydoor Common law tradition (England); systematised in Anglo-American jurisprudence