Summative Evaluation
Summative evaluation is evaluation conducted to render an overall judgement of a program, policy or product — its merit, worth, effectiveness or impact — typically after it has been implemented or has matured. Named by Michael Scriven in his 1967 essay 'The Methodology of Evaluation' as the counterpart to formative evaluation, its purpose is to inform consequential decisions: whether to continue, expand, replicate, defund or certify an intervention. It addresses the bottom-line question 'did it work, and was it worth it?' for audiences such as funders, policymakers and the public.
Baca kaedah sepenuhnya
Log masuk dengan akaun percuma untuk membaca bahagian ini.
Peta kaedah
Kejiranan kaedah berkaitan — pilih satu nod untuk meneroka.
Sumber
- Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago: Rand McNally. ISBN: 9780528616600
Cara memetik halaman ini
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Summative Evaluation of Program Merit and Worth. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ms/public-policy/summative-evaluation
Kaedah yang mana?
Letakkan kaedah ini di sebelah kaedah yang paling rapat dengannya dan baca secara bersebelahan — perpustakaan menyusun buku di atas meja; pilihan terletak pada anda.
- Penilaian Impak Kaunterfaktual (CIE)Inferens Kausal↔ banding
- Formative EvaluationPublic Policy↔ banding
- Impact Evaluation DesignPublic Policy↔ banding
- Process EvaluationPublic Policy↔ banding
Dirujuk oleh
Kaedah serupa
Terjumpa masalah pada halaman ini? Laporkan atau cadangkan pembetulan →