Analytic Hierarchy Process for Strategic Priorities
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) applied to strategic priorities is a multi-criteria decision method that structures a complex strategy choice into a hierarchy of goal, criteria, and alternatives, then derives priority weights from expert pairwise comparisons. Thomas Saaty developed AHP in the 1970s and set out its full theory in his 1980 book, with a widely cited 1990 article distilling how to make a decision with the method. Its appeal for strategy is that it converts the qualitative judgments managers actually make — that growth matters more than cost control, say — into ratio-scale weights, while quantifying and policing the consistency of those judgments. The result is a transparent, defensible ranking of strategic options that integrates multiple, often conflicting, criteria.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 9780070543713
- Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I ↗
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Analytic Hierarchy Process for Strategic Priorities (Pairwise-Comparison Prioritization of Strategic Decisions). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/strategic-management/ahp-strategic-priorities
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Porter's Five Forces Industry AnalysisStratēģiskā vadība↔ salīdzināt
- Strategic Importance-Performance AnalysisStratēģiskā vadība↔ salīdzināt
- SWOT-AHP Hybrid AnalysisStratēģiskā vadība↔ salīdzināt
Uz to atsaucas
Līdzīgas metodes
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →