ScholarGate
Asistents
Process / pipelineBiblical exegesis / Gospel composition

Redaction Criticism

Redaction criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte) studies the biblical authors not as passive collectors of tradition but as genuine authors and theologians who shaped their inherited material to make a point. Where form criticism dissolved the Gospels into independent oral units, redaction criticism puts the spotlight back on the evangelist who selected, arranged, and edited those units. By comparing the final text with the sources and traditions behind it, the critic isolates the changes the author made, looks for a consistent pattern in those changes, and reads off the theological program that motivated them. Hans Conzelmann's 1953 study of Luke is the classic example, and Norman Perrin's 1969 primer What Is Redaction Criticism? introduced the method to English readers and articulated its logic.

Atvērt MethodMindDrīzumāLietojiet, salīdziniet, saņemiet norādījumus
Rīki un resursi
Lejupielādēt slaidus
Mācieties un izpētiet
VideoDrīzumā

Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu

Tikai dalībniekiem

Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.

Pieteikties

Metožu karte

Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.

Avoti

  1. Perrin, N. (1969). What Is Redaction Criticism? Philadelphia: Fortress Press. ISBN: 9780800601812
  2. Conzelmann, H. (1960). The Theology of St Luke (trans. G. Buswell). New York: Harper. [German 'Die Mitte der Zeit', 1953]. link

Kā citēt šo lapu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Redaction Criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte: Editorial Theology of the Final Author). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/religious-studies/redaction-criticism

Kura metode?

Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.

Salīdzināt blakus

Uz to atsaucas

ScholarGateRedaction Criticism (Redaction Criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte: Editorial Theology of the Final Author)). Izgūts 2026-06-24 no https://scholargate.app/lv/religious-studies/redaction-criticism · Datu kopa: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026