Form Criticism
Form criticism (Formgeschichte) studies the small, originally oral units that make up the biblical text, asking what genre each unit belongs to, what social setting gave rise to it, and how it developed before reaching written form. Hermann Gunkel pioneered the approach for the Hebrew Bible, treating the narratives of Genesis and the Psalms as folk forms shaped by communal use, while Rudolf Bultmann and Martin Dibelius applied it to the Gospels, analyzing the sayings and stories about Jesus as units that circulated and were shaped by the early church before the evangelists wrote. Bultmann's 1921 History of the Synoptic Tradition is the method's most systematic statement. The core conviction is that form and function are linked: a unit's genre points to the recurring life-setting, the Sitz im Leben, in which the community used it.
Lasīt pilno metodes aprakstu
Piesakieties ar bezmaksas kontu, lai lasītu šo sadaļu.
Metožu karte
Saistīto metožu apkaime — atlasiet mezglu, lai izpētītu.
Avoti
- Bultmann, R. (1963). The History of the Synoptic Tradition (trans. J. Marsh). New York: Harper & Row. [German original 1921]. ISBN: 9780060611729
- Gunkel, H. (1987). The Legends of Genesis: The Biblical Saga and History (trans. W. H. Carruth). New York: Schocken Books. [German original 1901]. ISBN: 9780805200867
Kā citēt šo lapu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Form Criticism (Formgeschichte: Genre Classification and Tradition History). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/lv/religious-studies/form-criticism
Kura metode?
Novietojiet šo metodi blakus tās tuvākajām radniecīgajām metodēm un lasiet tās līdzās — bibliotēka noliek grāmatas uz galda; izvēle ir jūsu.
- Historical-Critical ExegesisReligious Studies↔ salīdzināt
- Intertextuality AnalysisReligious Studies↔ salīdzināt
- Redaction CriticismReligious Studies↔ salīdzināt
- Source Criticism (Documentary Hypothesis)Religious Studies↔ salīdzināt
Uz to atsaucas
Līdzīgas metodes
Pamanījāt kļūdu šajā lapā? Ziņojiet vai ierosiniet labojumu →